Exiled and Erased: Inside Andrii Telizhenko's Nightmare

Recently, the Counterlawfare Institute traveled to meet Ukrainian whistleblower Andrii Telizhenko at an undisclosed location.
For years, Andrii has been one of the most pivotal figures in the Ukraine story. A former Ukrainian diplomat who served at Ukraine's embassy in Washington, D.C., he became a key witness to events that would later play a central role in some of the biggest political scandals in living memory, including Ukrainian involvement in the 2016 election, the Hunter Biden corruption allegations, the first impeachment of President Donald Trump, and the subsequent effort to dismiss all of those concerns as "Russian disinformation."
Today, Andrii lives in a strange form of exile.
Sanctioned by the United States government without ever being charged with a crime, unable to maintain a normal banking relationship, travel freely, or participate in ordinary economic life, he exists in a legal and political limbo that few Americans even know exists. He is also listed by Ukraine as a sanctioned individual, despite being a Ukrainian citizen who served his country in its diplomatic corps.
Meeting him was an unsettling experience.
Because of the threats against him and his appearance on what has become known as a Ukrainian "kill list," communication had to be conducted carefully. We had established contact only through X. He had no reason to know who we were or whether we could be trusted. Understandably, he insisted on meeting in a secure location.
What we found was not the caricature that has been presented to the public for years.
Instead, we found a man who has visibly paid a steep personal price for the role he played in exposing information that powerful people would have preferred remain hidden.
The physical toll was evident.
Without delving into private medical matters, it is fair to say that years of sanctions, isolation, financial hardship, and relentless attacks have had serious consequences. As Andrii himself notes during the interview, one sometimes gets the impression that his adversaries believe that if enough pressure is applied for long enough, eventually he will simply disappear.
Yet despite everything, he remains determined to tell his story.
That story begins long before most Americans ever heard his name.
From Ukrainian Diplomat to Key Witness
Born into a family deeply involved in Ukraine's foreign service, Andrii spent much of his childhood abroad, including time in Egypt and Canada, before studying in the United States. That international background helped propel him rapidly through Ukraine's diplomatic and governmental institutions.
During the 2014 Maidan revolution, he served as an intermediary between Ukrainian and American officials. He recalls coordinating visits by senior U.S. officials, such as Victoria Nuland and Chris Murphy, and working closely with many of the individuals who would later become central figures in the U.S.–Ukraine relationship.
After the revolution, Andrii worked in Ukraine's Prosecutor General's Office. According to his account, concerns regarding Hunter Biden and Burisma were well known within Ukrainian government circles long before they became household topics in the United States. In our interview, he discusses what he personally observed and what investigations existed at the time.
He also recounts the profound disillusionment of Ukrainian prosecutors who had genuinely believed the United States was committed to democracy and the rule of law, only to discover that when their investigation reached Hunter Biden, powerful American interests, led by the U.S. Embassy in Kiev, worked to undermine it.
He was later assigned to Ukraine's embassy in Washington, where he became a firsthand witness to diplomatic interactions between Ukrainian officials and senior members of the Obama administration.
Among the most significant episodes he describes is a January 2016 White House meeting between Ukrainian prosecutors and then-National Security Council official Eric Ciaramella. According to Andrii's account, this was the moment when the Obama administration's campaign to force the removal of Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin, Andrii's former boss, became unmistakably clear to the Ukrainian delegation. Shokin's office had amassed an extensive investigative file relating to Hunter Biden.
The significance of those events would not become fully apparent until years later, when Joe Biden publicly boasted that he had used $1 billion in U.S. taxpayer-funded loan guarantees to force Shokin's dismissal. The episode would later become central both to the Hunter Biden scandal and to the impeachment of President Trump.
Our interview also explores another little-discussed chapter of the story: Ukrainian efforts to influence the 2016 election.
In early 2017, Politico published a groundbreaking report documenting efforts by Ukrainian officials to assist Hillary Clinton's campaign and undermine Donald Trump's candidacy. Andrii was one of the sources who helped confirm aspects of that story.
That decision would alter the course of his life.
Years later, during the Trump impeachment proceedings and subsequent Senate investigations, Andrii again became a key witness. He spent months briefing FBI investigators and staff working for Senator Ron Johnson's investigation into Biden family dealings in Ukraine. He also shared information with Rudy Giuliani, President Trump's personal attorney, who was conducting his own inquiries into the matter.
Sanctioned Without Being Charged
Then everything changed.
In 2020, as Senate investigators pursued evidence related to Ukraine and the Biden family, the FBI launched an effort to falsely characterize the allegations as Russian disinformation. This effectively shut down legitimate investigative avenues and discredited witnesses who had firsthand knowledge of events.
Shortly thereafter, Andrii's U.S. visa was revoked.
Then, in January 2021, the U.S. government imposed sanctions on him under Executive Order 13848, alleging election-related interference. That Order, in turn, is premised on the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment overseen by then CIA Director John Brennan, which concluded that Vladimir Putin had helped Donald Trump win the 2016 election. As then Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard revealed in 2025, however, that determination was not merely unsupported by the underlying intelligence. It was directly contradicted by it.
More than five years later, the consequences remain devastating.
As Andrii explains in our interview, sanctions have transformed many ordinary aspects of life into constant obstacles. It is not simply a matter of losing a bank account or a job. One by one, the institutions on which modern life depends begin shutting their doors. Before long, you find yourself unable to work, travel, obtain financial services, or participate in the ordinary economic life that everyone else takes for granted.
Whether one agrees with Andrii's conclusions or not, one fact is indisputable: few individuals have paid a higher personal price for speaking publicly about U.S.–Ukraine relations during this turbulent period.
His story is also profoundly paradoxical.
The easiest path available to him today would be to relocate to Russia, where his language skills, education, and experience would make employment relatively straightforward. Yet doing so would instantly validate the very accusations that have been leveled against him for years.
Preserving Testimony Before It Is Lost
As he explains in the interview, it is a classic Catch-22.
After spending several hours with Andrii, we came away convinced that his story deserves to be heard directly from him.
That is why we recorded this extensive interview.
Whether you agree with his interpretations, disagree with his conclusions, or simply want to better understand one of the most consequential and misunderstood political sagas of the last decade, we encourage you to watch the interview in full and judge the evidence for yourself.
The work of locating, interviewing, documenting, and preserving the testimony of individuals like Andrii is exactly why the Counterlawfare Institute exists.
Many of these stories are slowly disappearing as witnesses grow older, documents slip into obscurity, and public attention inevitably moves on. Meanwhile, the victims themselves are often left to bear the personal, professional, and financial consequences of lawfare alone.
Our mission is to ensure that their testimony is preserved, their experiences are not forgotten, and, wherever possible, that those who have been targeted receive the support they need.
If you believe the victims of lawfare deserve to be heard, please watch the interview, share it with others, and consider supporting the Counterlawfare Institute. Your support enables us to preserve the historical record, shine a light on abuses of power, and help those whose lives have been devastated by lawfare.
